Bio is open. Every brand in your workspace gets its own public link page, with sixteen templates, video and music playing inside the page, and a date window on each link. Visits and clicks are counted from day one, and the page is served by this marketing site rather than by the application.
The unit is the brand, not the account or the person
The decision that shapes everything else is what the page hangs off. It does not hang off a user and it does not hang off an Instagram account: it hangs off the brand. Run four brands in the same workspace and you have four independent pages, with their own links, their own colors and their own numbers, never mixed.
Inside each page go the links with an icon, a title and a description line underneath, a row of icons holding the brand's own profiles, and one of sixteen templates, with the heading typeface and the button shape left to you. The theme is not invented from scratch each time: the page inherits the one the rest of the workspace already uses, so an agency that has set its palette once does not pick it again here.
For an agency that means a page per client without opening a separate product, without a second subscription and without handing round the password of one more tool. For a creator with three projects it means three identities that do not bleed into each other, and for a business with two lines of work, two pages that do not have to resemble one another.
What the page does not solve, and it is better said early, is the profile line that leads to it. You write that line, it fits into very few characters, and it decides half of the taps.
What the page holds, with Pro and without
Bio sells in two levels and the gap between them is smaller than the name suggests. Almost everything the page does sits in the included level; what Pro opens is a short and specific list.
| Included | With Bio Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| A page for every brand in the workspace | Yes | Yes |
| Sixteen templates, over the workspace theme | Yes | Yes |
| YouTube video and Spotify album inside the page | Yes | Yes |
| Featured link and a date window on each link | Yes | Yes |
| Visits and clicks counted | Yes | Yes |
| Day by day detail of those figures | No | Yes |
| GoFeed mark in the page footer | Yes | No |
| An address code you write yourself | No | Yes |
| The page served on your own domain | No | No |
The last row is the one worth reading twice. Serving the page from your own domain is not Bio Pro but a separate add on, bought on its own and only in agency workspaces. Choosing your code and choosing your domain are two different purchases, and it is better to know that before a launch than during one.
This site serves it, and that changes three things
The address is short and it is served by the site you are reading now, not by the application. It sounds like an infrastructure detail and it has three consequences you can feel.
The first is speed: the page loads with no session and no intermediate redirects, which is what separates a link in bio that opens from one abandoned half loaded on a mediocre mobile connection.
The second is that search engines see it as an ordinary page. It is the one surface in the whole product that wants to be indexed, while the workspace and the quote and brief links refuse flatly. And because sometimes you do not want it there, each page carries a switch that keeps it out.
The third is that it is not cached, on purpose. When you hit publish, the change is live on the next visit, and a link scheduled to appear today appears on the first read after that hour. It is less efficient, and it avoids the worst conversation in this category, which is explaining to somebody why their change is still not showing.
Two honest warnings about the address code. Changing it breaks nothing: the old address redirects permanently to the new one, and a retired code is never handed to another page, so a poster printed last year still leads where it should. And the permission is read on every visit rather than at save time, so if you stop paying for the add on the mark comes back to the footer that same day, with nobody having touched the page's content or its colors.
Clicks are stored from day one
Two things are counted: the page's visits and each link's clicks. That answers the only question that matters here, which is not how many people came by but which link took the attention, because next week's ordering comes out of it.
There is an architectural detail worth knowing because it is money: the rows are stored from day one, Pro or no Pro. What the Pro level opens is the day by day detail, not the collection. Switching it on in March draws the chart backwards to January, and nobody loses a history for not having bought in time. It is the opposite of what most of the market does, where the data starts on the day you pay.
Two warnings about reading those figures. A visit is not a person: somebody who opens the page on Monday and returns on Thursday is two visits, and adding up a month of days will always give a bigger number than the people who came by. And a link's click rate only means something compared against itself, because on a page like this the position matters more than the wording.
Everything in this article happens in one place in GoFeed.
Try it freeHow a page that converts gets ordered
The page's numbers live next to the rest of the brand's network numbers, so the tap on a link and the reach of the post that pushed it are read in the same week and in the same place. That is what turns the page into something ordered with data instead of by instinct.
Three decisions do almost all of the work. The first is the featured link, which rises to the top and looks different from the rest: it should be whatever you want to happen this week, and it changes every week. The second is the description line under each link, which is what separates "Shop" from "Shop, delivered across Spain in 24 hours"; people do not tap labels, they tap promises.
The third is the date window, the least eye catching feature and the one that changes a routine most. Sign ups open on the 12th and close on the 26th, so you prepare the link on the 3rd with its two dates and forget about it. On the 12th it is at the top without anybody going in to put it there, and on the 27th it is gone, which is the part that normally fails: everybody remembers to publish and nobody remembers to take down. The screen by screen setup is on the Bio page, and the detail of each piece is in the link in bio write up.
It is in every plan, and a downgrade does not take it away
The page sits in every plan row of all three workspace kinds, and dropping a tier does not withdraw it. It is one of only two things in the product that can be said without qualification, and it is built that way on purpose: a public page that disappears because its owner changed plan is a broken link in a hundred other people's profiles that you do not control.
What does have to be said plainly is that there is no free plan here. A workspace whose trial ends unpaid, or whose subscription lapses past the grace period, is locked: it turns read only and its connected accounts are released. The link page is one of the things that survives the lock, along with the data, the history and the documents, and it becomes editable again the day it is paid. What does not survive are the files: fourteen days later the Drive and the media library are purged, with a warning letter three days before and another the day before. What each tier holds, and where the Pro add on sits, is on the pricing page, which renders the live catalogue.
One fewer piece in the pile
The underlying argument is not that this page does something impossible elsewhere. It is that the page, the calendar pushing traffic towards it and the analytics explaining whether it worked stop being three separate subscriptions with three dashboards that never reconcile.
If you are adding up what your current set of tools costs, that full calculation with every piece's figures on the table is in the cost of a social media stack. And if you are coming from a tool dedicated to this one job and want the feature by feature contrast, it is in the head to head comparison.